NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ashcroft Cleaning Services Pty Ltd t/as Wiseberry Acclaim Real Estate v Braganza [2019] NSWCATAP 14 Hearing dates: 28 November 2018 Date of orders: 09 January 2019 Decision date: 09 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: M Harrowell, Principal Member T Simon, Senior Member Decision: (1) Charlene Braganza is joined as a respondent in the appeal. (2) Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013, a further hearing is dispensed with. (3) Leave to appeal is refused and the appeal is otherwise dismissed. Catchwords: APPEAL – Leave to appeal – finding of misrepresentation in connection with agency agreement – failure to disclose relevant market conditions – decision available on the evidence Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules, 2014 (NSW) Fair Trading Act, 1987 (NSW) Property, Stock and Business Agent's Act 2002 (NSW) Cases Cited: Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Demagogue v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ashcroft Cleaning Services Pty Ltd t/as Wiseberry Acclaim Real Estate (Appellant) Swail Braganza (First Respondent) Charlene Braganza (Second Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Johnsons Law Group (Appellant) S Braganza (Self Represented) (Respondents) File Number(s): AP 18/38853 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: Not applicable Date of Decision: 7 August 2018 Before: M Tibbey, Senior Member File Number(s): COM 18/20840
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate