NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hylton v Hayes [2019] NSWCATAP 18 Hearing dates: 26 November 2018 Date of orders: 15 January 2019 Decision date: 15 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: R Titterton, Principal Member S Frost, Senior Member Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Matter remitted to the Consumer and Commercial Division of the Tribunal differently constituted. Catchwords: APPEAL – question of law – denial of procedural fairness – whether a hearing was conducted Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Cases Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Hylton and Rose Hylton, Appellants Peter Hayes and Amy Henman, Respondents Representation: Solicitors: L C Muriniti and Associates (Appellants) P Hayes & A Henman (Self Represented) (Respondents) File Number(s): AP18/40153 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Citation: N/A Date of Decision: 26 August 2018 Before: D Moss, General Member File Number(s): COM 17/27282; COM 18/33528
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate