NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MB v SG [2019] NSWSC 4 Hearing dates: 2, 24 November 2017 Date of orders: 14 January 2019 Decision date: 14 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: See paras [91] to [94] Catchwords: CONTEMPT – breach of interlocutory injunction in proceedings for defamation – whether contumelious – consideration of appropriate penalty Legislation Cited: Court Suppression and Non-Publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), s 7 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 10, 98 and 99A Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 121 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), r 55.7 Cases Cited: Attorney-General for New South Wales v Dean (1990) 20 NSWLR 650 Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union Ltd v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98; [1986] HCA 46 Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125; [2008] HCA 36 MB v SG [2017] NSWSC 1203 Pang v Bydand Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 69 Principal Registrar of the Supreme Court v Jando (2001) 53 NSWLR 527; [2001] NSWSC 969 Registrar of the Court of Appeal v Maniam (No 2) (1992) 26 NSWLR 309 Supreme Court v Jando (2001) 53 NSWLR 527; [2001] NSWSC 969 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525; [1995] HCA 3 Wood v Staunton (No 5) (1995) 86 A Crim R 183; [1995] NSWSC 61 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MB (plaintiff) SG (defendant) Representation: Counsel: B McClintock SC with A M B Cornish (plaintiff) Defendant self-represented
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate