NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: CPD v Office of the Children's Guardian [2019] NSWSC 8 Hearing dates: 22 March 2018 Decision date: 17 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of decision by NCAT confirming refusal to grant a "working with children check clearance" – where person seeking clearance had been tried for sexual offences against a child and found not guilty of all offences – finding by NCAT that the child's allegations were proved on the balance of probabilities – whether decision entailed legal error – application of so-called Briginshaw standard – alleged failure to afford procedural fairness – alleged failure to consider the plaintiff's sworn evidence – whether reasons revealed prejudgment – whether the finding was unreasonable – adequacy of reasons Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW), ss 14, 18, 30 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 38(5)(c),57, 62, Sch 3 cl. 17(1)(a) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 140 Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW), ss 57, 58, 63 Cases Cited: BKE v Office of Children's Guardian [2015] NSWSC 523 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 CPD v Children's Guardian [2017] NSWCATAD 162 Greyhound Racing Authority v Bragg [2003] NSWCA 388 Haines v Leves (1987) 8 NSWLR 442 Karakatsanis v Racing Victoria Ltd (2013) 42 VR 176; [2013] VSCA 305 M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69; [1988] HCA 68 Office of the Children's Guardian v CFW [2016] NSWSC 1406 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CPD (Plaintiff) Office of the Children's Guardian (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Lawrence for the Plaintiff Mr P Singleton for the Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate