NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Harrison v Riley [2019] NSWCATAP 31 Hearing dates: 16 November 2018 Date of orders: 25 January 2019 Decision date: 25 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: L Pearson, Principal Member S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is refused. (2) The Appeal is dismissed. (3) The orders made on 18 July 2018 as amended on 30 August 2018 are varied to delete the words "on or before 18 August 2018" and substitute the words "within 28 days of the date of these orders". Catchwords: APPEAL – Parties to contract – Whether error in conclusion that work not undertaken with due care and skill - Evidence Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Al-Daouk v Mr Pine Pty Ltd t/as Furnco Bankstown [2015] NSWCATAP 111 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 Pethybridge v Stedikas Holdings Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 154 Prendergast v Western Murray Irrigation Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 69 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Roy Harrison (First Appellant) Roy Harrison Floor Maintenance Contractors Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) (Second Appellant) Maureen Riley (Respondent) Representation: R Harrison (Self Represented)(First Appellant) M Riley (Self Represented)(Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate