NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Claudia Leung in her capacity as Executrix of the Estate of the late Robert Ho v Paul Mervyn Fordyce t/as Pmf Legal Trading [2019] NSWSC 18 Hearing dates: 11, 12, 13, 14 December 2017;Written submissions: 6, 7, 14, 19 December 2017, 22 January 2018 and 6 February 2018 Decision date: 29 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Plaintiffs entitled to declarations that costs agreements not sent and to consequential relief Catchwords: EVIDENCE — onus of proof when a declaration is sought in relation to a negative fact — plaintiffs seek declaration that defendant solicitor did not send costs agreements DECLARATIONS — onus of proof when a declaration is sought in relation to a negative fact — plaintiffs seek declaration that defendant solicitor did not send costs agreements Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Albrighton v Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (1980) 2 NSWLR 542 Amirbeaggi v Business in Focus (Australia) Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 421 Application of Ferdinando Scali [2010] NSWSC 1254 Armagas Ltd v Mundogas S.A. (The Ocean Frost) [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1 Aytul Ak-Tankiz v Ferat Ak & Ramazan Ak [2014] NSWSC 1044 Bater v Bater [1951] P 35 BCI Finances Pty Ltd (in liq) v Binetter (No 4) (2016) 348 ALR 227; [2016] FCA 1351 Blacket v Barnett [2017] NSWSC 1032 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63; (1774) 98 ER 969 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; [1938] HCA 34 Connor v Blacktown District Hospital (1971) 1 NSWLR 713 Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council v Darkinjung Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 132 Department of Health v Arumugam [1988] VR 319 Elayoubi v Zipser [2008] NSWCA 335 Ex parte Ferguson; Re Alexander (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 64; (1944) 62 WN (NSW) 15 Fordyce v Ho [2015] NSWCA 240 Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 247 CLR 486; [2012] HCA 39 Fulton v Fulton [2014] NSWSC 619 Gray v Guardian Trust Australia [2003] NSWSC 704 Ho v Fordyce (ex parte) [2014] NSWSC 1404 Ho v Powell (2001) 51 NSWLR 572; [2001] NSWCA 168 Hutchison Construction Services Pty Ltd v Fogg; Fogg v Les Quatre Musketeers Pty Ltd (t/as Plastamasta South Coast) [2016] NSWCA 135 In the matter of Kit Digital Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] NSWSC 1547 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Juul v Northey [2010] NSWCA 211 Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 563; [1995] HCA 68 Krstic v Brindley [2006] NSWSC 1414 Kuligowski v Metrobus (2004) 220 CLR 363; [2004] HCA 34 Maguire v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449; [1997] HCA 23 Nadinic v Drinkwater (2017) 94 NSWLR 518; [2017] NSWCA 114 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 110 ALR 449 at 450; [1992] HCA 66 Palmer v Dolman [2005] NSWCA 361 Rail Corporation New South Wales v Donald; Staff Innovations Pty Ltd t/as Bamford Family Trust [2018] NSWCA 82 Re Atkinson [1971] VR 612 Re Day (2017) 91 ALJR 262; [2017] HCA 2 Robert Ho v Paul Mervyn Fordyce t/as Pmf Legal Trading [2015] NSWSC 544 Robert Ho v Paul Mervyn Fordyce t/as Pmf Legal Trading (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1748 SAMM Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Shaye Properties Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 132; (2017) 345 ALR 633 Sangha v Baxter [2009] NSWCA 78; (2009) 52 MVR 492 Saravinovska v Saravinovski (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 964 Sgro v Australian Associated Motor Insurer's Limited (2015) 91 NSWLR 325; [2015] NSWCA 262 Steinberg v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 134 CLR 640; [1975] HCA 63 Strong v Woolworths Limited (2012) 246 CLR 182; [2012] HCA 5 The Nominal Defendant v Cordin [2017] NSWCA 6 Tinnock v Murrumbidgee Local Health District (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 87 Warner v Hung, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) (No 2) (2011) 297 ALR 56; [2011] FCA 1123 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 Wentworth v Rogers [2005] NSWSC 143 Ex parte Ferguson; Re Alexander (1944) 45 SR (NSW) 64; (1944) 62 WN (NSW) 15 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Claudia Leung (first plaintiff) Rhodium NSW Pty Ltd (second plaintiff) The Trading House Pty Ltd (third plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate