NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Walker v R [2019] NSWCCA 4 Hearing dates: 19 November 2018 Decision date: 01 February 2019 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Rothman J at [138]; Price J at [142] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – sixteen counts alleging sexual misconduct against an underage complainant – six alleged incidents between 1986 and 1989 – jury trial – not guilty verdicts returned on eleven matters and guilty verdicts on five matters – applicant contends verdicts inconsistent – evidence principally that of applicant and complainant – pretext phone call – whether verdicts capable of standing together – verdicts not inconsistent – leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – ss 61D, 66C, 112 Cases Cited: Darby v R [2016] NSWCCA 164 Jafary v R [2018] NSWCCA 243 Mackenzie v The Queen [1996] HCA 35; 190 CLR 348 R v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290; 52 NSWLR 82 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 ML v R [2015] NSWCCA 27 Miller v R [2014] NSWCCA 34 Stanford v R [2018] NSWCCA 249 Still v R [2010] NSWCCA 131 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151; 74 NSWLR 299 Tsaccounis v R [2016] NSWCCA 163 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Walker – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: S Pararajasingham – Applicant BK Baker – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate