NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Fregnan v Stanizzo; Stanizzo v Badarne; Stanizzo v State of New South Wales [2019] NSWSC 26 Hearing dates: 30 January 2019 Date of orders: 01 February 2019 Decision date: 01 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: 1. Adjourn the proceedings to 12 February 2019 for hearing. 2. Reserve the costs of the plaintiff's application to vacate the hearing. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – civil procedure – where plaintiff claims damages for malicious prosecution – where State ordered to produce documents to plaintiff despite claim for privilege – documents not produced pending appeal to Court of Appeal – where plaintiff seeks orders vacating hearing date pending determination of the appeal – whether application to vacate should be granted – whether partial adjournment preferable
PROCEDURE – civil procedure – where s 67 notice issued by State – whether hearing should be vacated until status of witness availability established Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: Stanizzo v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWSC 2003 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Vincent Francis Stanizzo Karina Vivianna Fregnan Muammad Badarne State of New South Wales Representation: Counsel: C Waterstreet and M Rollinson (V Stanizzo) A Kumar (K Fregnan) A Macauley (M Badarne) N Newton and T Buterin (State of NSW) File Number(s): 2012/1296492014/924252016/296293 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate