NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Gwilliam v R [2019] NSWCCA 5 Hearing dates: 12 October 2018 Date of orders: 06 February 2019 Decision date: 06 February 2019 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Walton J at [11] Wilson J at [12] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCE – wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – disputed facts - whether the sentencing judge erred in making findings as to motive – whether findings supported by evidence – basis of drawing inferences - whether applicant was denied procedural fairness – whether the sentencing judge erred in setting the non-parole period Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Barca v The Queen [1975] HCA 42; 133 CLR 82 Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd [1940] AC 152 Chow v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) NSWLR 593 Coy Pty Limited v McGuiness [2000] NSWCA 29; 49 NSWLR 262 Duncombe v R [2013] NSWCCA 271 Jones v Great Western Railway Co (1930) 47 TLR 39 Lane v R (2013) 241 A Crim R 321; [2013] NSWCCA 317 Luxton v Vines [1952] HCA 19; (1952) 85 CLR 352 Malvaso v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 227 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619 R v Altham (Court of Criminal Appeal, 18 June 1992, unreported per Hunt CJ at CL) R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Seltsam Pty Limited v McGuiness; James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited v McGuiness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262; [2000] NSWCA 29 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shane Ronald Gwilliam – Applicant Regina – Crown Representation: Counsel: Ms M. Avenell – Applicant Ms T. Smith – Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate