NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.55) [2018] NSWSC 2011 Hearing dates: 2 November 2018 Date of orders: 02 November 2018 Decision date: 02 November 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Accede to the application of Crown that the limitation imposed on the use of Exh 171 and Exh 172 pursuant to s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 be removed.
(2) Exh 171 and Exh 172 are now admitted unconditionally. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – discretions – application to remove limit on use of evidence previously imposed pursuant to Evidence Act 1995, s 136 – evidence in two exhibits relating to DNA laboratory processes and results – where evidence of various scientists established that the necessary scientific processes recorded in the exhibits had been followed – where court was not satisfied that there was any unfair prejudice to the Accused – where evidence was of high probative value – limit on use removed – evidence not excluded pursuant to Evidence Act, s 137 Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: R v Warwick (No.49) [2018] NSWSC 1557 Texts Cited: Expert Witness Code of Conduct Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) A R Conolly / E Ramsay (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) A R Conolly & Co (Accused) File Number(s): 2015/222068 Publication restriction: Not Applicable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate