NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Bishay Developments Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 29 Hearing dates: 24 December 2018 Decision date: 14 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Directions made as to conduct of proceedings. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE — Originating process — Amendment — Where amendments and part of additional evidence to be led was late and would delay trial — Where no adequate explanation of delay in making amendments or serving substantial exhibit to affidavit. Cases Cited: - Aon Risk Services Ltd v Australian National University (2005) 239 CLR 175 - Bi v Mourad [2010] NSWCA 17 - Elsmore Resources Ltd [2016] NSWSC 884 - Hans Pet Constructions Pty Ltd v Cassar [2009] NSWCA 230 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Tadros Holding Pty Ltd (First Plaintiff) Eissa Tadros (Second Plaintiff) Bishay Developments Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Peter Holmes Investments Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Manotik Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Peter Marcus Holmes (Fourth Defendant) Sobhy Jean Nicola (Fifth Defendant) Kiumars Hashemizadeh (Sixth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: N Kidd SC (Plaintiffs/Respondents) D Pritchard SC (Defendants/Applicants)
Solicitors: SKM Lawyers (Plaintiffs) G & S Law Group (Defendants) File Number(s): 2016/232549
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate