NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kai Ling (Australia) Pty Ltd v Rosengreen [2019] NSWCA 3 Hearing dates: 6 December 2018 Decision date: 05 February 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Sackville AJA at [2]; Barrett AJA at [6] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs Catchwords: CONTRACTS – formation – novation – requirements for effective novation of contract by substitution of party – whether option to purchase land novated in favour of substituted grantee. Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 38 Cases Cited: ALH Group Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (2012) 245 CLR 338; [2012] HCA 6 Fu Tian Fortune Pty Ltd v Park Cho Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 282 Olsson v Dyson (1969) 120 CLR 365; [1969] HCA 3 United Dominions Corporation Ltd v Brian Pty Ltd (1985) 157 CLR 1; [1985] HCA 49 Vickery v Woods (1952) 85 CLR 336; [1952] HCA 7 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kai Ling (Australia) Pty Ltd (Appellant) Robert Daniel Rosengreen (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Garry McGrath SC/Mr A Norrie (Appellant) Mr G Laughton SC/Mr J O'Sullivan (Respondent)
Solicitors: Ma & Company Solicitors (Appellant) Stacks Champion Legal (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/242893 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: Supreme Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Equity Division Citation: [2018] NSWSC 1068 Date of Decision: 12 July 2018 Before: Lindsay J File Number(s): 2015/355348
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate