NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sanpoint Pty Ltd v V8 Supercars Holding Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 5 Hearing dates: 25 May 2018 Decision date: 07 February 2019 Before: Beazley P; Macfarlan JA; Leeming JA Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACTS — Construction — Interpretation — whether primary judged erred in construction of commercial contract — whether respondent undertaking contractually required tender process was required to disclose status of ongoing negotiations with a third party to appellant — standard of disclosure and relevant time of disclosure required by contract
CONTRACTS — Breach of contract — Standards of contractual duty — whether primary judge erred in finding no breach of commercial contract by respondent — whether contract correctly construed required respondent to disclose to appellant status of third party negotiations during due diligence period — whether respondent breached contractual requirement to disclose
CONTRACTS — Remedies — Damages — Loss of chance — whether respondent's failure to disclose to appellant an offer made by third party caused the appellant to lose a chance to sell its rights under a contract at a substantially higher price
CORPORATIONS — Directors and officers — Disclosure requirements — where there are common directors of two companies – whether knowledge acquired by one director in course of acting for one company will be imputed to the second company Cases Cited: Badenach v Calvert (2016) 257 CLR 440; [2016] HCA 18 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Re Hampshire Land Company [1896] 2 Ch 743 Re Marseilles Extension Railway Company (1871) LR 7 Ch App 161 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332; [1994] HCA 4 V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd v Lucas Dumbrell Investments Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 1391 Texts Cited: R P Austin, Company Directors: Principles of Law & Corporate Governance (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2005) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sanpoint Pty Ltd (Appellant) V8 Supercars Holdings Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Australian Motor Racing Partners Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C R C Newlinds SC; B K Koch (Appellant) P Braham SC; T E O'Brien (First and Second Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate