NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Credit Solutions Group Pty Ltd v Obelisk Ventures Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 50 Hearing dates: 8 November 2018 Date of orders: 08 February 2019 Decision date: 08 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: (1) Grant leave to the defendants to serve a cross-claim pleaded in accordance with these reasons for judgment on the following conditions:
(a) The amended defence filed 2 October 2018 is struck out with leave to the defendants to serve a further amended defence pleaded in accordance with these reasons for judgment;
(b) Payment by the defendants to the plaintiff of the principal sum loaned pursuant to the agreement dated 19 September 2013.
(2) Any further amended defence and cross-claim is to be served on the plaintiff's solicitors within 28 days of today.
(3) The defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs of the Notice of Motion. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – specialist lists - Possession List – pleadings – form and content of pleading - leave sought to file and serve cross-claim out of time – where pleadings assert a number of conclusions in the absence of material facts – imprecise and inconsistent pleadings – facts pleaded across two separate pleadings – whether the proposed cross-claim was embarrassing – whether the cross-claimants should be permitted to file any subsequent cross-claim
MORTGAGES – mortgages and charges generally – rights and liabilities of mortgagor and mortgagee – whether finance broker the agent of mortgagor or mortgagee Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ss 12DA, 12DB, 12GM Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) s 9 Cases Cited: Fitzgerald v Watson [2011] NSWSC 736 McGuirk v The University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 Morlend Finance Corporation (Vic) Pty Ltd v Westendorp [1993] 2 VR 284 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Credit Solutions Group Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Obelisk Ventures Pty Limited (First Defendant) International Events & Speakers Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Maxwell Daniel Markson (Third Defendant) Westpac Banking Corporation (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Smith (Plaintiff) M Klooster (First, Second & Third Defendants) No appearance (Fourth Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate