NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hamzy v R [2019] NSWDC 7 Hearing dates: 29 – 30 January 2019 Date of orders: 04 February 2019 Decision date: 04 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Whitford SC DCJ Decision: Application for Permanent Stay of Proceedings allowed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Trial – Re-trial on new Indictment – Abuse of process – stay of proceedings. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act - s8(1) Criminal Code (C'th) 1995 - s11.2A; s 11.2A(7); s307.1(1); s313.3 Criminal Procedure Act - s20; s129; s130 District Court Act 1973 (NSW) - s 156(1) Cases Cited: Clark (a Pseudonym) v The Queen [2016] VSCA 96; 258 A Crim R 511 Gilham v R [2012] NSWCCA 131 Grassby v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 1 Jago v District Court of New South Wales [1989] HCA 46; (1989) 168 CLR 23 Maxwell v R [1996] HCA 46; (1996) 184 CLR 501 Parker v R [1997] HCA 15; (1997) 186 CLR 494 R v Anderson (1991) 53 A Crim R 421 R v Jacobi (2012) 114 SASR 227 R v Smith (1995) 1 VR 10 R v Taufahema [2007] HCA 11; (2007) 228 CLR 232 Reid v The Queen [1980] AC 343 Romolo v R [2018] NSWCCA 3 The Queen v Edwards [2009] HCA 20; (2009) 83 ALJR 717 UBS AG v Tyne [2018] HCA 45; 92 ALJR 968 Victims Compensation Fund Corporation v Brown (2003) 77 ALJR 1797; [2003] HCA 54 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; 174 CLR 509 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mejid Hamzy - Applicant Regina (Crown) - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr P Boulten SC with Mr T Liu - Applicant Mr D Jordan - Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate