NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: SafeWork NSW v Neville George Hetherington [2019] NSWDC 11 Hearing dates: 10 December 2018 Date of orders: 11 February 2019 Decision date: 11 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Scotting DCJ Decision: (1) Paragraphs 14(a) and 14(f) of the Summons are struck out. (2) I grant leave to the prosecutor to re-plead the allegations set out in those sub-paragraphs. (3) I grant leave to the prosecutor to re-plead the allegations in [14(b)] and [14(c)] of the Summons, if so advised. (4) In each sub-paragraph of [14] of the Summons the words in italics in [53] of this Judgment are struck out. (5) I direct that the prosecutor file and serve an Amended Summons on or before 5pm on 23 February 2019. (6) I will hear the parties on costs. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – prosecution – Work Health & Safety – duty of persons undertaking business - risk of death or serious injury CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – pleadings – strike out – amendment of Summons – application to quash Summons refuse – application for stay refused – parts of Summons struck out – leave to replead Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 Work Health and Safety Act 2011 Cases Cited: Baiada Poultry Pty Ltd v R (2012) 246 CLR 92 Barron v Attorney-General (1987) 10 NSWLR 215 Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75 Carrington Slipways Pty Ltd v Callaghan (1985) 11 IR 467 Inspector Aldred v Herbert [2007 NSWIRComm 170 Inspector Hayes v Santos and Lorenzo [2009] NSWIRComm 163 Inspector Kumar v Ritchie [2006] NSWIRComm 323 Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23 John L Pty Ltd v Attorney-General (NSW) (1987) 163 CLR 508 Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531 Laing O'Rourke (BMC) Pty Ltd v Kirwin [2011] WASCA 117 McKie v Al-Hassani [2015] ACTIC 1 R v Board of Trustees of the Science Museum [1993] 1 WLR 1171 R v Janceski (2005) 64 NSWLR 10 R v Rushton [1967] VR 842 S v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 266 Slivak v Lurgi (Aust) Pty Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 304 Thiess Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 78 NSWLR 94 Universal Telecasters (Qld) Ltd v Guthrie (1978) 18 ALR 531 Walsh v Tattersall (1990) 188 CLR 77 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 WorkCover Authority v Daly Smith Corporation [2004] NSWIRComm 349 Texts Cited: Barry Sherriff and Michael Tooma, Understanding the Model Work Health and Safety Act (Wolters Kluher) Category: Principal judgment Parties: SafeWork NSW v Neville Hetherington Representation: Counsel: Mr Hammond (Prosecutor) Mr Barry (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate