NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Meissner v Lindsay [2019] NSWSC 82 Hearing dates: 12 February 2019 Date of orders: 12 February 2019 Decision date: 12 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraph [29] Catchwords: FAMILY PROVISION – former spouse – prior property settlement orders – freedom of testamentary disposition – criminal history – size of estate Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dijkhuijs v Barclay (1988) 13 NSWLR 639 Hampson v Hampson [2010] NSWCA 359 Lodin v Lodin [2017] NSWCA 327 Sgro v Thompson [2017] NSWCA 326 Steinmetz v Shannon [2018] NSWSC 1090 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ladislaus Meissner – the plaintiff Pamela Lindsay – the defendant Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff – in person Mr K Morrissey – for the defendant
Solicitors: Ladislaus Meissner - plaintiff in person E Berman & Co – for the defendant File Number(s): 2013/260130
Judgment
Introduction 1. This is an application for a family provision order pursuant to the Succession Act 2006. There are many problems facing the plaintiff. I am afraid to say that the claim is virtually hopeless. It seems to have been presented solely on the basis of the plaintiff's needs and financial position, about which I am far from satisfied. No consideration has been given to other considerations including the entitlement of the deceased to the exercise of her freedom of testamentary disposition.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate