NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Munro v State of NSW [2019] NSWDC 13 Hearing dates: 5, 6, 7 & 8 March 2018 (Last submissions 11 May 2018) Date of orders: 15 February 2019 Decision date: 15 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Judge Levy SC Decision: 1. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $38,206 including pre-judgment interest;
2. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered;
3. The exhibits may be returned;
4. Liberty to apply on 7 days' notice if further or other orders are required. Catchwords: TORTS – intentional torts – claims of alleged wrongful arrest, false imprisonment, assault and battery – whether claims made out; DAMAGES – assessment of general compensatory damages, aggravated damages, exemplary damages, and interest Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 52, s 54, s 58, Crown Proceedings Act 1988 (NSW), s 5 Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), s 99(1), s 201, s 202, s 231 Law Reform (Vicarious Liability) Act 1983 (NSW), s 8 Police Act 1990 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: Christie v Leachinsky [1947] AC 573 Coyle v State of NSW [2006] NSWCA 95 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104; [1990] 170 CLR 104 Hage-Ali v State of NSW [2009] NSWDC 266 MBP (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657; [1991] HCA 3 McKinney v R [1991] 171 CLR 468 NSW v Radford [2010] NSWCA 276 Smith v State of NSW [2016] NSWDC 55 State of New South Wales v Smith [2017] NSWCA 194 State of NSW (NSW Police) v Nominal Defendant [2009] NSWCA 225 State of NSW v Abed [2014] NSWCA 419 State of NSW v Coleman [2000] NSWCA 183 State of NSW v Quirk [2012] NSWCA 216 State of NSW v Riley (2003) 57 NSWLR 496; [2003] NSWCA 208 State of NSW v Zreika [2012] NSWCA 37 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278; [1986] HCA 88 Zavarinos v State of New South Wales [2004] NSWCA 320 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Scott Brenden Edwin Munro (Plaintiff) The State of New South Wales (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Toomey SC with Mr D Woodbury (Plaintiff) Ms J Chapman (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate