NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Blacktown City Council v Concato (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 99 Hearing dates: 30 January 2019 Date of orders: 30 January 2019 Decision date: 30 January 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: The plaintiff has leave to proceed on the further amended summons Catchwords: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW), s 55 Entitlement to just compensation – s 59 legal costs reasonably incurred – construction of s 59(1)(a) – Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 56 overriding purpose of proceedings just, quick, cheap Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2002 (NSW) ss 56 to 60 Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) ss 26, 42, 43, 55, 59, 61 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Hoy v Coffs Harbour City Council [2016] NSWCA 257; 218 LGERA 411 L Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 2) (1982) 151 CLR 590; [1982] HCA 59 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Blacktown City Council (Plaintiff) Lodovico Antonio Concato (Defendant) Vilma Concato (Second Defendant) Office of the Valuer General (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P. Tomasetti SC with A. Hemmings and L. Nurpuri (Plaintiff) I. Hemmings SC with K. Lindeman (First and Second Defendants) L. Waterson (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate