NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Huang v Wong (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 18 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 19 February 2019 Before: Beazley P; Meagher JA; Simpson AJA Decision: 1. The applicant's notice of motion filed on 5 July 2018 is dismissed.
2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the notice of motion. Catchwords: NOTICE OF MOTION – UCPR 36.15 – application to set aside judgment or order given or entered irregularly, illegally, or against good faith – proceedings discontinued – no irregularity, illegality or want of good faith demonstrated – application refused – application for access to sound recordings – administrative procedure – application refused – notice of motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Legal Profession Uniform law (NSW) Cases Cited: Chao (Isabel) Huang v Dr Kam S Wong, District Court of NSW, unreported, 3 November 2016 Huang v Wong [2018] NSWCA 94 State Rail Authority of NSW v Condelfa Construction Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 29 (at 38); [1982] HCA 51. University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28; (1985) 59 ALJR 481; Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Chao (Isabel) Huang (Applicant) Kam S Wong (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: In person (Applicant) M Hutchings (Respondent)
Solicitors: N/A Meridian Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/351845 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: N/A
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate