NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Pavlou v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2019] NSWCATOD 27 Hearing dates: 17 December 2019 Date of orders: 19 February 2019 Decision date: 19 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Dr J Lucy, Senior Member Decision: The respondent's decision is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Security licensing – Where applicant's application for a security licence refused by respondent - Where applicant convicted of fraud and other offences – Where no evidence of remorse – Where applicant not candid with Tribunal – Whether applicant a fit and proper person to hold a licence Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Brandusoiu v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2011] NSWADT 57 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127 IJ v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2003] NSWADT 230 Sobey v Commercial Agents Board [1979] 22 SASR 70 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kon Pavlou (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant in person Office of the General Counsel (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/00223317
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate