NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Phung v Phung [2019] NSWSC 117 Hearing dates: 4 February 2019 – 6 February 2019 Date of orders: 19 February 2019 Decision date: 19 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Plaintiff entitled to orders for specific performance Catchwords: LAND LAW – contract for sale of land – claim for specific performance – whether oral contract for sale of land concluded – defendant subsequently signs written note referring to agreement to "transfer the ownership" of property – whether written note satisfies writing requirements under Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 23C(1)(a) and 54A – doctrine of part performance – whether sufficient acts of part performance – plaintiff goes into possession, pays outgoings and undertakes renovations – sufficient acts of part performance established – whether specific performance should be refused on the basis of unfairness or hardship – specific performance granted Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), ss 23C, 54A Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 68 Cases Cited: Baloglow v Konstantinidis (2001) 11 BPR 20,721; [2001] NSWCA 451 Cavallari v Premier Refrigeration Company Pty Ltd (1952) 85 CLR 20 Cooney v Burns (1922) 30 CLR 216 Dougan v Ley (1946) 71 CLR 142 Dowsett v Reid (1912) 15 CLR 695 Fragomeni v Fogliani (1968) 42 ALJR 263 Fullers' Theatres Ltd v Musgrove (1923) 31 CLR 524 Harvey v Edwards, Dunlop & Co Ltd (1927) 39 CLR 302 Johnson v Buttress (1936) 56 CLR 113 Khoury v Khouri (2006) 66 NSWLR 241; [2006] NSWCA 184 Maddison v Alderson (1883) 8 App Cas 467 McBride v Sandland (1918) 25 CLR 69 Pipikos v Trayans (2018) 92 ALJR 880; [2018] HCA 39 Regent v Millett (1976) 133 CLR 679 Sinclair, Scott & Co Ltd v Naughton (1929) 43 CLR 310 Stewart v Kennedy (1890) 15 App Cas 75 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Tamplin v James (1880) 15 Ch D 215 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Cam Vinh Phung (Plaintiff) Cam Tai Phung (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Gaven (Plaintiff) Mr K G Bennett (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate