NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v Nguyen [2019] NSWSC 131 Hearing dates: 12, 13, and 14 June 2018 Date of orders: 22 February 2019 Decision date: 22 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Declaration that the plaintiff holds a 40% equitable interest in the property. Directions given for the holding of a supplementary hearing for an accounting between the plaintiff and the defendant. Subject to any party applying for a special costs order the defendant will be ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the hearing. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – resulting trust – constructive trust – oral agreement between plaintiff and defendant to purchase property – property purchased in name of defendant – plaintiff pays the deposit, stamp duty and a portion of the mortgage payments for the property – whether defendant holds the property as to a 40% interest on constructive trust for the plaintiff – whether the defendant holds the property legally and beneficially. Cases Cited: Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 Black Uhlans Incorporated v NSW Crime Commission [2002] NSWSC 1060 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 CLR 242 West v Mead [2003] NSWSC 161 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: Thi Anh Thuy Nguyen Defendant: Anh Tuan Nguyen Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: B Zipser Defendant: J Shaw
Solicitors: Plaintiff: Thi Truc Mai Dang, Integrity Legal Specialists Defendant: Keith Wilson Ewart, F W Ewart & Ewart File Number(s): 2015/151521 Publication restriction: No
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate