NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ta Lee Investment Pty Ltd v Antonios [2019] NSWCA 24 Hearing dates: 19 September 2018 Decision date: 22 February 2019 Before: Bathurst CJ; Beazley P; Macfarlan JA Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – whether appeal futile in circumstances where respondent is registered proprietor of land – whether contractual right to lodge caveat created an equitable interest in favour of appellant
CONTRACTS – formation – whether parties entered into contract for sale of land – form of contract entered into Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 42 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A(10) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 51.54 Cases Cited: Aged Care Services Pty Ltd v Kanning Services Pty Ltd (2013) 86 NSWLR 174; [2013] NSWCA 393 Agricultural & Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570; [2008] HCA 57 Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 604; [1988] HCA 16 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378; [1978] HCA 50 Coleman v Bone (1996) 9 BPR 16,235 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169; [2014] HCA 32 Commonwealth v McLean (1996) 41 NSWLR 389 Holloway v McFeeters (1956) 94 CLR 470; [1956] HCA 25 Iaconis v Lazar (2007) 13 BPR 24,937; [2007] NSWSC 1103 John Alexander's Clubs Pty Ltd v White City Tennis Club Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 1; [2010] HCA 19 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Manly Council v Byrne [2004] NSWCA 123 Murphy v Wright (1992) 5 BPR 11,734 News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd (1996) 64 FCR 410; [1996] FCA 870 Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596; [1979] HCA 51 Taleb v National Australia Bank Ltd (2011) 82 NSWLR 489; [2011] NSWSC 1562 Troncone v Aliperti (1994) 6 BPR 13,291 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ta Lee Investment Pty Ltd (Appellant) Alexander James Antonios (First Respondent) MV Developments (Lane Cove) Pty Ltd (in liq) (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V F Kerr SC; P T Newton (Appellant) J Knackstredt (First Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate