NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Khadivzad v The Owners – Strata Plan 53457 [2019] NSWSC 157 Hearing dates: 31 January 2019 Date of orders: 26 February 2019 Decision date: 26 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Summons dismissed, with no order as to costs. Catchwords: LAND LAW – strata title – validity of by-laws – by-law granted exclusive rights to certain lot owners to use parts of common property for car parking – by-law purportedly repealed in 1999 by special resolution of Owners Corporation – no written consent obtained from lot owners concerned prior to repealing the by-law as required by Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW) ("SSM Act"), s 52(1)(a) – Change of By-Laws recorded on title within two years – proceedings commenced in 2018 to challenge validity of repeal – effect of SSM Act, s 52(3) – conclusive presumption after two years that all conditions and preliminary steps precedent to the making of a repealing by-law have been complied with and performed – requisite consent of owners is a condition or preliminary step precedent to the making of a repealing by-law – proceedings dismissed Legislation Cited: Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 (NSW), Part 4, Division 1 Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW), ss 42, 48, 51, 52, 162 Cases Cited: James v The Owners Strata Plan No 11478 (No 4) [2012] NSWSC 590 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Khosrow Khadivzad (Plaintiff) Strata Plan No 53457 (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M W Sneddon (Plaintiff)
Solicitors: Fox & Staniland Lawyers (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2018/228417 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate