NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Semple v R [2019] NSWCCA 40 Hearing dates: 20 February 2019 Decision date: 01 March 2019 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Price J at [52]; Adamson J at [53] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal is granted. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – two counts of supplying a prohibited drug – sentence of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years – whether sentence manifestly excessive – whether applicant denied procedural fairness – appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – ss 112(1), 319 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) – s 5(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) – ss 10(1), 25(1) Cases Cited: Bland v R [2014] NSWCCA 82 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 DL v The Queen [2018] HCA 32; 92 ALJR 764 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 R v Robert Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102 R v Tucakavoic (District Court (NSW), Williams SC DCJ, 25 January 2017, unrep) Upadhyaya v R [2017] NSWCCA 162 Zhao v R [2016] NSWCCA 179 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert Lachlan Semple – Applicant Regina – Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: Applicant in person H Roberts – Respondent Crown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate