NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Warwick (No.64) [2019] NSWSC 163 Hearing dates: 18-21 February 2019 Date of orders: 28 February 2019 Decision date: 28 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: See [202] – [205] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application for stay of proceedings due to lack of legal representation – Dietrich principles – whether the applicant is indigent – whether the applicant is without fault – where a grant of legal aid has expired – where 50% of legal title to property is in the name of the applicant – whether the trial would be unfair without legal representation – trial is stayed to provide applicant with further opportunity to obtain legal aid grant Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Cases Cited: Attorney-General for NSW v Milat (1995) 37 NSWLR 370 Barton v The Queen [1980] HCA 48; (1980) 147 CLR 75 Craig v State of South Australia [1995] HCA 58; (1995) 184 CLR 163 Cummings v R (1994) 12 SR (WA) 172 Dietrich v The Queen [1992] HCA 57; (1992) 177 CLR 292 Grant v Edwards [1986] Ch 638 Green v Green (1989) 17 NSWLR 343 Jago v District Court of NSW[1989] HCA 46; (1989) 168 CLR 23 Maharaj v Jai Chand [1986] AC 898 McInnes v R [1979] HCA 65;(1979) 143 CLR 575 Moss v Brown [1979] 1 NSWLR 114 Philopos v R [2008] NSWCCA 66 Potier v R [2015] NSWCCA 130 R v Chaouk; Attorney-General for the State of Victoria (Intervener) and Others [2013] VSCA 99; (2013) 40 VR 356; R v Edwards [2009] HCA 20; (2009) 255 ALR 399 R v Joyce [2003] NSWCCA 280 R v Macdonald (No 4) [2016] NSWSC 486 R v Warwick (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1225 R v Warwick (No.5) [2018] NSWSC 70 R v Warwick (No.7) [2018] NSWSC 236 R v Warwick (No.8) [2018] NSWSC 354 R v Warwick (No.21) [2018] NSWSC 654 R v Warwick (No.63) [2019] NSWSC 41 R v BK [2000] NSWCCA 4; (2000) 110 A Crim R 298 Regina v Kay (1998) 100 A Crim R 367 Shepherd v Doolan [2005] NSWSC 42 State of NSW v Canellis [1994] HCA 51; (1994) 181 CLR 309 The Queen v Connell (No.7) [1995] 13 WAR 283 Warwick v Legal Aid Commission of NSW [2018] NSWSC 1920 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; (1992) 174 CLR 509 Texts Cited: Not Applicable Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Crown Leonard John Warwick (Accused) Representation: Counsel: K McKay / G Christofi (Crown) A R Conolly / E Ramsay (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate