NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Stephen Pfuhl; R v Jake Gardiner [2018] NSWDC 467 Hearing dates: 11 – 12 October Date of orders: 12 October 2018 Decision date: 12 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Stephen Pfuhl: I sentence you to imprisonment. I set a non-parole period of one year and three months, commencing on 30 August 2017 and expiring on 29 November 2018. I impose a further period of imprisonment of one year to commence upon the expiration of the non-parole period and expiring on 29 November 2019. The total sentence is therefore two years and three months comprising the non-parole period and the balance of the sentence. I have found special circumstances. You are eligible to be considered for release to parole at the expiration of the non-parole period.
Jake Keith Anthony Gardiner: I sentence you to imprisonment. I set a non-parole period of one year and two months commencing on 16 July 2018 and expiring on 15 September 2019. I impose a further period of imprisonment of one year and one month to commence upon the expiration of the non-parole period and expiring on 15 October 2020. The total sentence is therefore one year and three months comprising the non-parole period and the balance of the sentence. I have found special circumstances. You are eligible to be considered for release to parole at the expiration of the non-parole period. Catchwords: CRIME – SENTENCE - break, enter and steal knowing a person present in premises - co-offenders - joint criminal enterprise - in company but victim asleep during crime - small amount taken of no sentimental value - no property damage - offenders having different personal circumstances - parity - when should sentence commence (PFUHL) - alleged risk of institutionalisation (GARDINER) Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: R v Ponfield [1999] NSWCCA 435 R v Gardiner [2016] NSWDC 402 R v Gardiner [2017] NSWDC 409 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown) Stephen Pfuhl (Offender) Jake Gardiner (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Ms Stuart (Crown) Mr Voros (Offender Pfuhl) Ms Khalilizadeh (Offender Gardiner)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate