NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Benhayon v Rockett (No 9) [2019] NSWSC 172 Hearing dates: 6 December 2018 Date of orders: 28 February 2019 Decision date: 28 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Lonergan J Decision: (1) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings on an indemnity basis;
(2) The defendant's application for leave for collateral use of the documents identified in paragraph [49] of this judgment is dismissed, each party to pay its own costs of that application; and
(3) The matter is listed at 9:30am on Wednesday 6 March 2019 (or other such date and time as agreed by the parties, and notified to my Associate), for submissions to be made as to why I should not refer Universal Law to the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner for investigation in respect of the conduct raised in paragraphs [29] to [36] of this judgment. Catchwords: COSTS – defamation – actions for defamation – indemnity costs – where the defendant seeks indemnity costs – where the defendant early in the litigation made an offer of settlement in writing – where at the time of the offer of settlement, there was no Defence filed – where the plaintiff unreasonably failed to accept a settlement offer made by the defendant – where the counterproposal amounts to a relevant matter to be considered in exercising the discretion to order indemnity costs
PROCEDURE – discovery of documents not admitted into evidence – use of documents – where defendant seeks leave to use documents obtained in present proceedings – use of documents obtained for collateral purpose of making complaints to regulatory authorities about the plaintiff – whether leave should be granted Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 30, 40 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 21.7, 42.1 Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] 3 All ER 333 Davis v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 946 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] AC 280 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10 Category: Costs Parties: Serge Isaac Benhayon (Plaintiff) Esther Mary Rockett (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: N Olson (Plaintiff) T Molomby SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate