NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 19) [2019] NSWSC 262 Hearing dates: 11 March 2019 Date of orders: 11 March 2019 Decision date: 14 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) Tender of report of Dr Luke Toombes dated 15 February 2019 rejected. (2) Tender of report of Dr Sharmil Markar dated 21 February 2019 rejected; (3) Costs of the application to tender the reports be reserved. Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – Re-opening – tender of further experts reports in response to leave granted to plaintiff to re-open – whether basis for allowing re-opening allows other parties to revisit decisions not to file evidence in response to plaintiff's expert – tender disallowed. Cases Cited: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater (No 18) [2018] NSWSC 1828 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Rodriguez & Sons Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater (First Defendant) SunWater Limited (Second Defendant) State of Queensland (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Sexton SC; N Owens SC; R Yezerski; J Taylor (Plaintiff) B O'Donnell QC; A Pomerenke QC; D Piggott; D Klineberg (First Defendant) D Williams SC; HJA Neal; N Simpson (Second Defendant) GA Thompson QC; JM Horton QC; E Morzone (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate