NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Gokhan Eyuboglu [2019] NSWSC 181 Hearing dates: 21 February 2019 Decision date: 21 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Button J Decision: Trial to proceed by judge alone. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – murder – application by accused for trial by judge alone – consent of Crown – requirement for leave due to lateness of application – leave not opposed by Crown – foreshadowed defences of mental illness and substantial impairment – whether concern about appropriateness of trial by judge alone could inform question of refusal of leave – leave granted, application granted, order for trial by judge alone made Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 132(2), 132A(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 23A Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Hutchison, Wilkinson & Greentree [2018] NSWSC 1513 R v M'Naghten (1843) 8 ER Rep 718 R v Hadler [2018] NSWSC 1151 AK v State of Western Australia (2008) 232 CLR 438; [2008] HCA 8 R v Stanley [2013] NSWCCA 124 at [61] Swain v Waverley Municipal Council (2005) 220 CLR 517; [2005] HCA 4 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Gokhan Eyuboglu (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Craig Everson (Crown) Tony Evers (Accused)
Solicitors: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) McGirr Lawyers (Accused) File Number(s): 2017/329217 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate