NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: JH v R [2019] NSWSC 192 Hearing dates: 27 February 2019 Decision date: 06 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: (1) Appeal allowed.
(2) The finding of guilt on 14 June 2018 for the offence of resist police in execution of their duty contrary to s 546C of the Crimes Act 1900 is set aside.
(3) The order made by the President of the Children's Court pursuant to s 33(1)(b) of the Children (Criminal) Proceedings Act 1987 on 14 June 2018 is vacated. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – resist police in execution of their duty – Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 546C – appeal to Supreme Court from decision of President of Children's Court – Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), Part 3 – where police approached 16-year-old on Manly Corso suspecting breach of bail conditions – where appellant lit up a cigarette contrary to Council signage – where officer said, "You have committed an offence but if you give me some ID we will leave it at that" – where appellant presented fake ID – where officers arrested appellant and he struggled violently resisting arrest – where arresting officer made no mention of issuing appellant Court Attendance Notice – whether police officer's intention was to charge appellant with smoking offence or to check bail conditions – whether police officers acting in the execution of their duty – Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), s 99(1)(b)(iii) – Robinson v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 231 considered Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW) s 33(1)(b) Children's Court Act 1987 (NSW) ss 6A(2), 22A Children's Court Regulation 2014 (NSW) r 6(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 546C Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1986 (NSW) s 9 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) ss 3, 11, 18, 19(1)(2), 20(1), 52, 53 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) s 632(1) Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) ss 19, 99(1), 201(1) Bail Act 2013 (NSW) s77(1) Cases Cited: Allesch v Maunz (2000) 203 CLR 172; [2000] HCA 40 AG v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2015] NSWCA 218 Gionoutsis v Glykis (2006) 65 NSWLR 539; [2006] NSWCCA 137 Charara v R [2006] NSWCCA 244 NSW v Randall [2017] NSWCA 88 Robinson v State of New South Wales [2018] NSWCA 231 Category: Principal judgment Parties: JH (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Healy (Appellant) Ms D White (solicitor) (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate