NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v SKL; R v JY; R v XGL [2019] NSWCCA 43 Hearing dates: 18 February 2019 Decision date: 05 March 2019 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1]; Adamson J at [2]; Button J at [90] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed.
(2) Quash the verdicts of acquittal.
(3) Order a new trial.
(4) List the matter for mention before the District Court on Friday 15 March 2019 at 9.30 am. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against directed acquittal – elements of offence of dishonestly obtaining financial advantage by deception – cheating at Baccarat – dealer's communication of cards to be dealt to players – scope for circumstantial case – whether necessary to identify particular minds deceived – whether necessary to call individuals Legislation Cited: Casino Control Act 1992 (NSW), 87 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2, ss 18, 236 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 192B, 192E Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), s 82 Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW), ss 107, 111 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 166, 168 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 58 Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), s 21 Theft Act 1968 (UK), s 15 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 82 Cases Cited: Duncan v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2016] NSWCA 143 Flack v R [2011] NSWCCA 167 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215; [1985] HCA 75 Hanave Pty Ltd v LFOT Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 357 Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (1988) 39 FCR 546 In re London and Globe Finance Corporation Limited [1903] 1 Ch 728 Jones v Acfold Investments Pty Ltd (1985) 6 FCR 512 Macleod v The Queen (2003) 214 CLR 230; [2003] HCA 24 Moore v R [2016] NSWCCA 260; (2016) 262 A Crim R 590 National Commercial Banking Corporation of Australia Limited v Batty (1986) 160 CLR 251; [1986] HCA 21 Reg. v Lambie [1982] AC 449 R v Charles [1977] AC 177 R v Clarkson [1987] VR 962 R v Jenkins (2002) 6 VR 81; [2002] VSCA 224 R v Laverty (1970) 54 Cr. App. R 495 R v PL [2009] NSWCCA 256 R v Rozeik [1996] 1 WLR 159 R v Sullivan (1945) 30 Cr. App. R. 132 Texts Cited: Archbold, Pleading Evidence and Practice in Criminal Cases (39th ed, 1976) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina SKL (Respondent) JY (Respondent) XGL (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Hatfield (Crown) P Neil SC/B Vasic/S Jayasuriya (Respondent XGL) D McMahon (Respondent SKL) A Parsons (Respondent JY)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate