NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v R [2019] NSWCCA 44 Hearing dates: 1 March 2019 Date of orders: 01 March 2019 Decision date: 13 March 2019 Before: Leeming JA at [1]; Harrison J at [41]; Davies J at [42] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – dealing with money reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime – Criminal Code (Cth) s 400.9(1) – whether sentencing judge failed to have regard to utilitarian benefit of guilty plea – whether error in determination of objective criminality – whether sentence manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A, 16AC Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5 Criminal Code (Cth), s 400.9 Cases Cited: EF v R [2015] NSWCCA 36 Jinde Huang aka Wei Liu v R [2018] NSWCCA 70 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 R v Bugeja [2001] NSWCCA 196 Xiao v R (2018) 96 NSWLR 1; [2018] NSWCCA 4 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Linda Lien Nguyen (Applicant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
M Ramage QC (Applicant) A Avery-Williams (Respondent)
Solicitors:
AKN & Associates (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2015/29930 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales Jurisdiction: Criminal Division Citation: None Date of Decision: 03 July 2018 Before: Arnott DCJ File Number(s): 2015/29930
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate