NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Davies v R [2019] NSWCCA 45 Hearing dates: 5 October 2018 Date of orders: 08 March 2019 Decision date: 08 March 2019 Before: Basten JA at [1]; Johnson J at [64]; R A Hulme J at [74] Decision: (1) Extend the time for filing the application for leave to appeal.
(2) Grant the applicant leave to appeal.
(3) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – sexual offences against children – vulnerability as an aggravating factor – whether the judge treated as an aggravating factor an element of the offences charged – whether factors of aggravation taken into account so that offender sentenced for offences not charged – whether abuse of trust and abuse of authority distinguished – The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 discussed
CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – pleas of guilty – whether sentencing judge required to indicate the discount applicable to the aggregate sentence – whether judge erred in applying a uniform discount to indicative sentences – whether discount failed to allow for early offers to plead, but pleas entered later
CRIMINAL LAW – sentence – whether individual indicative sentences manifestly excessive – whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 61J, 61M, 66A, 66C, 66EB, 91H Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 22, 53A, 54B Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25A Criminal Code (WA), s 582 Cases Cited: Bao v R [2016] NSWCCA 16 Elyard v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 43; (2006) 45 MVR 402 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; 246 A Crim R 528 Johnson v The Queen [2004] HCA 15; 78 ALJR 616 Kassoua v R [2017] NSWCCA 307 McIntosh v R [2015] NSWCCA 184 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59; [1988] HCA 70 MRW v R [2011] NSWCCA 260 PG v R [2017] NSWCCA 179 Prculovski v R [2010] NSWCCA 274 R v Gavel [2014] NSWCCA 56; 239 A Crim R 469 R v Nykolyn 2012] NSWCCA 219 Suleman v R [2009] NSWCCA 70 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383; [1981] HCA 31 Texts Cited: New South Wales Legislative Council, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 23 November 2010, p 27867 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Grant William Davies (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Dalton SC / S Kluss (Applicant) B Hatfield (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate