NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rahme v Satouris (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 208 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 07 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Emmett AJA Decision: Order that the plaintiffs pay the costs of the second defendant on the ordinary basis up to 31 October 2017 and on the indemnity basis from 1 November 2017 and that the plaintiffs pay the costs of the fourth defendant on the indemnity basis from 14 June 2018. Catchwords: COSTS – party/party – bases of quantification – indemnity basis – rejection by the plaintiffs of a no less favourable offer of compromise – further offers of compromise following joinder of another defendant – defendants insured under single policy of insurance Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(1) Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 20.26, 36.16(1), 36.16(3A) 42.15A(2), 42.5 Cases Cited: Rahme v Satouris [2018] NSWSC 1753 Category: Costs Parties: Dana Rahme (First Plaintiff) Gabriel Rahme (Second Plaintiff) Benjamin & Khoury Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Dieb P Khoury (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D A Allen (Plaintiffs) M O'Brien (Second and Fourth Defendants)
Solicitors: Kekatos Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Second and Fourth Defendants) File Number(s): 2015/300814
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate