NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Perram v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2018] NSWSC 2038 Hearing dates: 31 July 2018 Date of orders: 31 July 2018 Decision date: 31 July 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: The formal order of the Court, in the circumstances, is the prayer for relief in para 1 of the summons filed by the plaintiff on 30 July 2018 is refused. To that extent, the summons is dismissed but not otherwise. The second prayer for relief was not pressed.
I order that the plaintiff, Francis Shane Perram, pay the costs of the first and second defendants of today's proceedings as agreed or, in default, as assessed Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for urgent interlocutory relief – application to stay a decision of the Commissioner for Fair Trading – regulation of tattoo parlours under the Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 (NSW) – operator licence – NCAT power pursuant to the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) – whether the Court should grant a stay of the decision of the delegate – orders – costs Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 (NSW) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Frances Shane Perram (Plaintiff) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Defendant) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: H El-Hage (Defendants)
Solicitors: Lorne Havenstein Lawyers (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor's Office (Defendants) File Number(s): 2018/00233939
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate