NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Agius; R v Castagna (No 11) [2018] NSWSC 2043 Hearing dates: 21 March 2018 Decision date: 22 March 2018 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Adamson J Decision: Applications for verdict by direction refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – practice and procedure – application for verdicts by direction – refused as question whether income was that of accused or a company a question of fact for the jury Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995, Sch 1, s 135.4 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 19, 260 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 6-5 Cases Cited: Baker v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 20 ATR 798 Baker v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 20 ATR 1706 Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Mochkin (2003) 127 FCR 185; [2003] FCAFC 15 May v O'Sullivan (1955) 92 CLR 654 Raftland Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (2008) 238 CLR 516; [2008] HCA 21 Snook v London & West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786 Tupicoff v Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 4 FCR 505 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Robert Francis Agius Anthony Dante Castagna Representation: Counsel: P McGuire SC/A McGrath (Crown) P Lowe (Accused Agius) P Strickland SC/S White SC/S Callan (Accused Castagna)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate