NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gail Patricia Stone v Michael John Stone [2019] NSWSC 233 Hearing dates: 11, 12, 13 February 2019 Decision date: 08 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Summons dismissed Catchwords: SUCCESSION – FAMILY PROVISION – Succession Act 2006 (NSW) ss 59(1), 59(2) and 60 – necessity for applicant to make full and frank disclosure of her financial and material circumstances – where applicant deliberately fails to make that disclosure – application to reopen to adduce evidence deliberately not led earlier – application to reopen refused – HELD: proceedings dismissed. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Cringle v Cringle [2018] NSWSC 1558 DJ Singh v DH Singh and Others [2018] NSWCA 30 Hughes v National Trustees (1979) 143 CLR 134 Srekovic v Srekovic [2018] NSWSC 1597 Stone v Stone [2001] NSWSC 138 Stone v Stone [2014] NSWSC 1655 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing (2015) 256 CLR 507 White v Overland [2001] FCA 1333 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gail Patricia Stone - Plaintiff Michael John Stone - Defendant Representation: Counsel: G. Waugh SC - Plaintiff J.E. Brown - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate