NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Salmon v Albarran & Ors [2019] NSWSC 243 Hearing dates: 28 November, 13 December 2017, 21 February and 13 March 2018 Date of orders: 13 March 2019 Decision date: 13 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: See paragraph [155]. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Summary dismissal – plaintiffs file Amended Statement of Claim in February 2017 – defendants apply under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.28(1) to dismiss proceedings against them, on the basis that there is no real question to be tried – defendants propose to field a defence under Limitation Act 1969 – plaintiffs plead that the otherwise applicable limitation period was extended under Limitation Act, s 55 on the basis that the defendants concealed their cause of action from them until after the otherwise applicable limitation period expired – in reply, the defendants contend that uncontestable facts establish that the plaintiffs were well aware of the existence of their cause of action long before the applicable limitation period – whether or not the plaintiffs' pleading raises a "real" issue for trial. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 56, 57, 58(1) Corporations Act 2001, ss 420, 1317K, 588FF Federal Court of Australia Act 1986, s 31A Limitation Act 1969, ss 14, 23, 47, 55 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 14.28(1) Cases Cited: Beaman v Arts Ltd [1949] 1 All ER 465 Birtchnell v Equity Trustees Executors and Agency Co Ltd (1929) 42 CLR 384 Boston Commercial Services Pty Ltd v GE Capital Finance Australasia Pty Ltd (2006) 236 ALR 720 Burdick v Garrick (1870) LR5ChApp. 233 Bradman v Allens Arthur Robinson (2009) 103 SASR 438 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Smith (1991) 42 FCR 390 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 George (a Bankrupt) v Fletcher (Trustee) [2010] FCAFC 53 General Steels Industries v Commissioner of Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 In the matter of Galtari Pty Ltd (in liq) [2018] NSWSC 917 Jefferson Ford Pty Ltd v Ford Motor Co of Australia (2008) 167 FCR 372 Kovarfi v BMT& Associates Pty Ltd (No. 3) [2017] NSWSC 710 Kowalski v MMAL Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd (2009) 259 ALR 319 Maguire & Tansey v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449 Nelson v Rye [1996] 2 All ER 186 New South Wales v Williams (2014) 242 A Crim R 22 North American Land and Timber Co Ltd v Watkins [1904] 1 Ch 242 Queensland Pork Pty Ltd v Lott [2003] QCA 271 Spellson v George (1992) 26 NSWLR 666 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) 241 CLR 118 Three Rivers District Council v Governor & Company of the Bank of England (No. 3) [2001] UKHL16 Wannanup Development Nominees v Growden [2011] WASC 113 Wardley Australia Limited v State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Wentworth v Rogers (No. 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Texts Cited: JD Heydon, MJ Leeming and PG Turner, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity: Doctrines & Remedies (5th ed, 2014, LexisNexis Butterworths) para 36-075 Category: Consequential orders (other than Costs) Parties: First plaintiff- Owen Salmon Second plaintiff: TCBS Group Holdings Pty Limited ACN 112 571 647 First defendant: Richard Albarran Second defendant: Geoffrey McDonald Fourth defendant: Robert William Joseph Elliott Fifth defendant: Drew Anthony Townsend Sixth defendant: David Kenney Seventh defendant: Luigino Malacco Eighth defendant: Paul Andrew Leroy Representation: Counsel
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate