NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Malcolm Smith Pty. Limited v The Hills Shire Council [2019] NSWLEC 1096 Hearing dates: 5 March 2019 Date of orders: 07 March 2019 Decision date: 07 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon SC Decision: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The exhibits, apart from Exhibits C and D, are returned. Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: conditions of development consent imposed under s 94 (now s 7.11) of the EPA Act requiring monetary contributions – applicable s94 contributions plan – s94 conditions based on repealed contributions plan – development commenced – demand for services and facilities generated by the development – should current contributions plan apply Legislation Cited: Baulkham Hills Local Environmental Plan 1991 Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Local Government Act 1993 The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: Arkibuilt Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2006) 148 LGERA 85; [2006] NSWLEC 502 Bangalow Property Investments Pty Ltd v Byron Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1262 Fairfield City Council v N&S Olivieri Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 41 Monaldo Pty Ltd v Baulkham hills Shire Council [1995] NSWLEC 165 Progress & Securities Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1988) 66 LGRA 236 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Malcolm Smith Pty. Limited (Applicant) The Hills Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Fernandes (Applicant) S Pritchard SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate