NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Giovanni Romano v R (a pseudonym) [2019] NSWCCA 49 Hearing dates: 31 August 2018 Decision date: 18 March 2019 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Walton J at [34] Button J at [38] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal against conviction granted. (2) Appeal against conviction dismissed. (3) Leave to appeal against sentence granted. (4) Appeal against sentence dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – trial for sexual assaults of adult complainant – whether complainant answered question in cross-examination about other sexual contact with applicant non-responsively – whether defence counsel subsequently addressed jury inappropriately – whether trial judge misdirected jury about final address of defence counsel – appeal against conviction dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – aggregate sentence – whether trial judge adopted inappropriate implicit cumulation between indicative sentences – whether trial judge failed to consider question of implicit concurrence adequately – appeal against sentence dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), ss 141(1)(b), 143 and 293 Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: Browne v Dunn (1894) The Reports 67 Jeffree v R [2017] NSWCCA 72 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Giovanni Romano (a pseudonym) (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D Barrow (Appellant) T Smith (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate