NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Grogan v R [2019] NSWCCA 51 Hearing dates: 25 February 2019 Date of orders: 18 March 2019 Decision date: 18 March 2019 Before: Gleeson JA at [1] Harrison J at [2] Davies J at [42] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – where appellant sentenced for manufacturing commercial quantity of prohibited drug, supplying commercial quantity of prohibited drug, and knowingly dealing with proceeds of crime – where appellant sentenced to aggregate sentence of 14 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 10 years – whether in determining the aggregate sentence the sentencing judge erred in the application of the totality principle – whether the sentence imposed upon the applicant resulted in double punishment – whether sentence manifestly excessive – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 193B(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 24(2), 25(2) Cases Cited: Brent Redfern v R (2012) 228 A Crim R 56; [2012] NSWCCA 178 Kwok v R [2018] NSWCCA 200 Pannowitz v R [2016] NSWCCA 13 R v MAK (2006) 167 A Crim R 159; [2006] NSWCCA 381 Soames v R [2014] NSWCCA 158 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason John Grogan (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Djemal (Appellant) K Ratcliffe (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate