NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nicholas Arthur Stokes v Molly Harris Toyne [2019] NSWSC 274 Hearing dates: 15 & 16 October 2018 Decision date: 18 March 2019 Before: Rees J Decision: Judgment for the Plaintiff. Orders at [167]. Catchwords: LAND LAW — Conveyancing — Contract for sale — Deposit — Application for relief from forfeiture of deposit pursuant to Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 55(2A) — Whether unjust or inequitable — Factors relevant to exercise of the Court's discretion — improvements to land between exchange and termination – lengthy pre-contractual negotiations between parties — Significant funds expended to obtain finance — Vendor's right to terminate exercised after several extensions — Purchaser conferred benefit and detriment on Vendor by works undertaken on land — Purchaser caused modest increase in value of land — Order for return of deposit. Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 55(2A) Law of Property Act 1925 (UK), s 49(2) Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), s 49(2) Cases Cited: Butcher v Harkins [2001] NSWSC 15 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60 Chambers v Borness (2014) BPR 33,545; [2014] NSWSC 890 Fu Tian Fortune Pty Ltd v Park Cho Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 282 Fu Tian Fortune Pty Ltd v Park Cho Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 528 Harkins v Butcher; Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 558; [2002] NSWCA 237 Hasanovic v Polistena (1982) NSW Conv R ¶55-078 Havyn Pty Ltd v Webster (2005) 12 BPR 22,837; [2005] NSWCA 182 Kinder Investments Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council (2005) 143 LGERA 237; [2005] NSWLEC 737 Lucas & Tait (Investments) Pty Ltd v Victoria Securities Ltd [1973] 2 NSWLR 268 Mulkearns v Chandos Developments Pty Ltd (2003) 11 BPR 21,277; [2003] NSWSC 1132 Mulkearns v Chandos Developments Pty Ltd (No 4) (2005) 12 BPR 22,993; [2005] NSWSC 511 Nassif v Caminer (2009) 74 NSWLR 276; [2009] NSWCA 45 PC Developments Pty Ltd v Revell (1991) 22 NSWLR 615 Rushcutters Bay Developments Pty Ltd v Dragon Asset Investment Pty Ltd (No 2) (2017) 18 BPR 37,025; [2017] NSWSC 866 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nicholas Arthur Stokes (Plaintiff) Molly Harriss Toyne (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J. Ronald (Plaintiff) J.K. Raftery (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate