NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Braye v Tarnawskyj [2019] NSWSC 277 Hearing dates: 5 March 2019 Date of orders: 19 March 2019 Decision date: 19 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Possessory title established to part of claimed parcel of land Catchwords: LAND LAW – possessory title – claim made over area of land between two residential lots – qualified title – claimed land subject to right of way benefitting plaintiff's adjoining property – where the plaintiff and his tenants used parts of the claimed land for parking, storage and a garden – where the plaintiff undertook paving works on parts of claimed land – whether acts exceed those authorised by right of way – whether acts sufficient acts of possession showing an intention to exclude all others – where acts not done on a pathway area – possessory title established over part of the claimed land Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), ss 28A, 28J, 28P Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), ss 27, 65 Cases Cited: Butler v Muddle (1995) 6 BPR 97,532 Coffill v Lagudi Holdings Pty Ltd (2016) 18 BPR 36,483; [2016] NSWSC 1764 Hare v van Brugge (2013) 84 NSWLR 41; [2013] NSWCA 74 Higgs v Nassauvian Ltd [1975] AC 464 JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2003] 1 AC 419; [2002] UKHL 30 Kleiner v Randall [2005] NFSC 3 Laris v Lin (No 2) (2016) 18 BPR 35,917; [2016] NSWSC 560 Lord Advocate v Lord Blantyre (1879) 4 App Cas 770 Mulcahy v Curramore Pty Ltd [1974] 2 NSWLR 464 Owners of Strata Plan 48754 v Anderson (1999) 9 BPR 17,119; [1999] NSWSC 580 Powell v McFarlane (1979) 38 P&CR 452 Pwllbach Colliery Co Ltd v Woodman [1915] AC 634 Roberts v Swangrove Estates Ltd [2007] EWHC 513 (Ch) Seddon v Smith (1877) 36 LT 168 Thorpe v Frank [2019] EWCA Civ 150 Zenere v Leate (1980) 1 BPR 97,029 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Keith Stanley Braye (Plaintiff) Gloria Millicent Tarnawskyj (as Administrator of the Estate of the late Mary King) (First Defendant) Simon John Ward (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M L D Einfeld QC with Mr J Horowitz (Plaintiff) Mr R D Marshall SC (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate