NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: KTC v David (No. 1) [2019] NSWSC 281 Hearing dates: 13 and 14 March 2019 Decision date: 18 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Kunc J Decision: Pleading against fourth and fifth defendants struck out with leave to replead; proceedings to be cross-vested to Federal Court Catchwords: EQUITY — Fiduciary duties — Breach — Rule in Barnes v Addy — Whether claim for knowing assistance in fraudulent and dishonest design adequately pleaded Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: In re Emergent Capital Limited (In liq); KTC v RAAL Ltd; Grand Court of the Cayman Islands – Financial Services Division; Mr Justice Andrew J Jones QC; unreported; 23 November 2011 Barnes v Addy (1873-1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Farah Constructions Pty Limited v Say-Dee Pty Limited [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 Forrest v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 39; (2012) 247 CLR 486 Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Limited [2014] NSWCA 266; (2014) 87 NSWLR 609 Re-Engine Pty Ltd (in liq) v Fergusson [2007] VSC 57; (2007) 209 FLR 1 Shaw v State of NSW [2012] NSWCA 102 United Australia Limited v Barclays Bank Limited [1941] AC 1 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: KTC (Plaintiff)
Rodric David (First Defendant) Naveen David Singh (Second Defendant) XALT Pty Ltd (ACN 147 571 033) (Third Defendant) Gilbert + Tobin (Fourth Defendant) Andrew Bullock (Fifth Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate