NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Wellington v Lawler [2019] NSWSC 284 Hearing dates: 06, 07, 09 March 2018 Date of orders: 19 March 2019 Decision date: 19 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (1) Summons dismissed;
(2) The plaintiff will pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the Summons, but not costs associated only with the defendant's Notice of Motion;
(3) The Court will hear the parties on any special or different order for costs and reserves same. Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – TORT – MOTOR ACCIDENT – "full and satisfactory explanation" – explanation not satisfactory from after July 2013 – summons dismissed. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 57 Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW) Motor Accidents Act 1998 (NSW), ss 40A, 43, 52, 79 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 151Z Cases Cited: Blatch v Archer (1774) 98 ER 969 Figliuzzi v Yonan [2005] NSWCA 290 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Russo v Aiello (2003) 215 CLR 643; [2003] HCA 53 Walker v Howard (2009) 78 NSWLR 161; [2009] NSWCA 408 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nathan Wellington (Plaintiff) William Huxley Lawler (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B J Gross QC with T J Boyd (Plaintiff) K P Rewell SC (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate