NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Network Ten Pty Ltd v TX Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWCA 51 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 22 March 2019 Decision date: 22 March 2019 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Meagher JA at [23]; Gleeson JA at [24] Decision: (1) Order that the second and third respondents pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and 50% of the appellant's costs in the Court below. Catchwords: COSTS – Party/Party – Exception to general rule that costs follow the event – apportionment – whether issues on which successful party was unsuccessful were clearly dominant or separable
COSTS – Party/Party – Bases of quantification – Indemnity basis Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Baker v Towle [2008] NSWCA 73 Cellarit Pty Ltd v Cawarrah Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 266 Monie v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 15 Network Ten Pty Ltd v TX Australia Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 312 Category: Costs Parties: Network Ten Pty Ltd (applicant) TX Australia Pty Ltd (first respondent) Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd (second respondent) Seven Network (Operations) Ltd (third respondent) Representation: Counsel: N Hutley SC with A Hochroth (applicant) A Bell SC with D Thomas (first respondent) K Williams SC with R Mansted (second respondent) D Sulan with K Petch (third respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate