NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Johnston (a pseudonym) [2019] NSWDC 61 Hearing dates: 25 February 2019 Date of orders: 25 February 2019 Decision date: 25 February 2019 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Separate trials Counts 1 to 6 and 7 to 11. Tendency evidence allowed Counts 1 to 6. Catchwords: Interlocutory orders - separate trials - admissibility of tendency evidence – cross admissibility - application of High Court Authority Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1987 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 GSH v R; R v GSH [2009] NSWCCA 214 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 92 ALJR 52; 344 ALR 187; [2017] HCA 20 IMM V The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300 McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52 The Queen v Bauer (a pseudonym) [2018] HCA 40 The Queen v Dickman [2017] HCA 24 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Phillip Johnston (Offender) Director of Public Prosecutions Representation: Counsel: Mr D Coyne (for the offender) Ms N Keay (for the Director of Public Prosecutions)
Solicitors: Ms A Fisher (for the offender) Ms J Azad (for the Director of Public Prosecutions) File Number(s): 2017/00187461 Publication restriction: No publication of any information that might identify child complainants inluding the identity of the defendant.. Each is to be referred to by a pseudonym which will not be their real initials. The Offender is referred to in this judgment by a pseudonym.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate