NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: ZJA v Public Guardian [2019] NSWCATAD 44 Hearing dates: 19 September 2018 Date of orders: 21 March 2019 Decision date: 21 March 2019 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J S Currie, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW –decision by Public Guardian as guardian under guardianship order – identification of the reviewable decision- place of accommodation of subject person –Obligations of decision maker under Guardianship Act 1987- principles in section 4- finding that decision maker correctly applied those principles; decision under review remained the correct and preferable decision. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act, 2013, No. 2 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014(NSW) Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW) Guardianship Regulation 2016 (NSW) Cases Cited: Drake v Minister of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1970) 2 ALD 60 P v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2015] NSWSC 579 WL v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2011] NSWADTAP 22 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: ZJA (Applicant) Public Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G. Mahony (Respondent)
Solicitors: ZJA (Self Represented)(Applicant) Crown Solicitor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate